The Supreme Court as Political Pornography (and Roe v. Wade as economic-cannibalism)

“Roe v. Wade is the law of the land” parrot various nominated bookworms in front of Congress, as the bookworms beg to be a law unto themselves for the rest of their lives—beg to be on the United States Supreme Court.

Roe v. Wade is not the law of the land. Know how you know? Trying enforcing Roe. You Can’t. A law is nothing without enforcement. But you cannot enforce Roe—because Roe is not a law. Roe is an opinion. It is the opinion of six white guys and a mulatto—3 of them Republicans. Roe v. Wade is the irrelevant opinion that women have a right to economic-cannibalism.

Decades ago, a white Republican man named Harry Blackmun wrote the Roe v. Wade opinion. That opinion endures only by the allowance of the people. The people of any state can demand that their legislature, or their governor, simply ignore the Roe opinion and pass laws against the economic-cannibalism of abortion. The activists on the Supreme Court would have precisely zero recourse. Alternatively, the people of every state can continue to do what they do now: ignore, tolerate, and even celebrate the rampant economic-cannibalism against the unborn.

Roe v. Wade is not “the law of the land,” because the Supreme Court does not write laws: it issues opinions. State legislatures and governors are free to reject and ignore the opinions of unconstitutional activist judges—regarding the economic-cannibalism of abortion or anything else. Any elected official who tells you otherwise is a liar, a traitor, complicit in the ongoing political pornography of Supreme Court opinions being “the law of the land”—and an apologist for economic-cannibalism.

—Russ Lindquist

*Note the actual controlling Supreme Court precedent on abortion (i.e. mass-murder) is note Roe v. Wade (1973)—but rather Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992). However, since pro-murder satanists and anti-murder activists are less familiar with Casey, the above analysis uses Roe v. Wade. The difference does not affect the accuracy of the analysis, which is only about the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court has only the political power given to it by both faces of USA’s traitorous uniparty.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s