The Symptom of Porn has Two Types

Porn can addict only men. Before manhood, boys are chemically incapable of an addiction to porn. Yet porn-addicion alongside the ubiquitous social-abuse of forcing young men into prolonged youth—this appears, to the myopic, as “porn addiction among boys.” But men are not boys.

Just as porn cannot addict boys, it cannot addict women, much less girls. First, women suffer the social abuse of forced post-youth “youth” even more than do men. So any “girl” who seems addicted to porn is really a women—one abused into shaving off her hair, and shearing off her hope: better to suffer through some non-mom role that industrialists inflict upon her generation of insufficiently protected prospective-mothers. Second, any woman who seems addicted to porn is really addicted to obeying abusers who intimidate her into wasting her life by mimicking the hobbies of men—including an addiction to vainly wishing for sex without consequences.

Sex Without Consequences

Sex without consequences is a myth. The myth addicts cowardly men who fear the consequences of sex. But the myth only ever disgusts those whose motherhood is the most-feared consequence of sex.

From the onset of womanhood, nature compels a woman’s body to compel her to crave fertilization. But in place of procreation, anti-family terrorists market, to her and her potential mates, only sterilized sport-fucking—which only the most ruined women can tolerate.

Commitment is another consequence of sex. But commitment through sex comes only by parenthood. Yet anti-family terrorists (bad government and its minions) still toil towards the impossible dream—the Satanic nightmare—of men and women who eschew parenthood but accept commitment otherwise. Meanwhile, porn-as-sex-without-consequence briefly obscures, in his self-poisoned mind, the failure of a cowardly, incomplete man; while a primped life of petty gossip, child-murder allowance, misadrist rallies, and other ersatz success—these caskets continually tempt many among the most doomed generations of women in history: into believing that she is more than failing, as life passes her by.

The symptom of porn has two types

One accelerates men’s anxiety; the other mitigates it. But both accelerate it—because self-deception is not real. The definition of porn is all you need to know about why porn is addictive: any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct. Then gatekeepers dictate, moment to moment, the meaning of “explicit”—the same gatekeepers who socially torture women into being the ugly, unlikeable failures that drive weak men into porn.

The anti-family formula is simple:

(1) throw the social-acids of fear and privilege into the faces of women, disfiguring her so men will avoid fertilizing her;
(2) outlaw his sexual alternatives as “explicit;”
(3) provide occasional waivers for some explicit alternatives: “porn;”
(4) oversee a slave-colony of sterilized women and cowardly masturbaters.

Conclusion

Only in a wasteland that tortures countless women into being horrid, whorish, mannish, anti-family commodities could men ever addict themselves to something so futile and empty as vicarious sex—”porn.” Yet only a coward plays along: a failure who surrenders his potential to Satanic terrorists by momentarily tugging away the anxiety that he should sublimate into the cause of fatherhood. Meanwhile, real men commit to the task of mansplaining these trash women into an anti-stupidity-social-coma, where she is too intimidated to continue spraying her previous cowardice all over him, herself, and everyone else.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s