In the 60’s, Brian Wilson of The Beach Boys imagined a surf city with “two girls for every boy.” Wilson was an oversexed, misogynist pervert.
In 2016, Yale University proudly published its goal of “Promoting Diversity and Equal Opportunity.”
Of the 42 people featured in Yale’s socialist sermon, 10 are men.
Yale University: Where “diversity and inclusion” means gilded man-children sanctimoniously surrounding themselves with 3 girls for every boy.
And the harem lived happily ever after—with 75% of its academic chattel cramming cotton up themselves, wearing little man-suits—and proving that women can do anything that patriarchs groom and beg she-students to bumble through in an exclusive harem.
Managing the Myriad Cotton-crammed Commodities
And in Yale’s silly little harem cult, minders are sure to micromanage all their hyper-socialized, beady-eyed spores—instructing them on such patriarchal purview as the “Definition of Sexual Consent,” a laughably lifeless screed laboriously phrased gender-neutrally, to avoid embarrassing the proudly pitiful penis-less wallflowers and academic tomboys for whom Yale enacts its solemn, prudish minder-policies:
Yale’s Mathematical Formula for Fostering Interpersonal Respect Among Weak, Dumb, Credulous Perverts
“Sexual activity requires consent, which is defined as positive, unambiguous, and voluntary agreement to engage in specific sexual activity throughout a sexual encounter. Consent cannot be inferred from the absence of a ‘no’; a clear ‘yes,’ verbal or otherwise, is necessary. Consent to some sexual acts does not constitute consent to others, nor does past consent to a given act constitute present or future consent. Consent must be ongoing throughout a sexual encounter and can be revoked at any time. Consent cannot be obtained by threat, coercion, or force. Agreement under such circumstances does not constitute consent.
“Consent cannot be obtained from someone who is asleep or otherwise mentally or physically incapacitated, whether due to alcohol, drugs, or some other condition. A person is mentally or physically incapacitated when that person lacks the ability to make or act on considered decisions to engage in sexual activity. Engaging in sexual activity with a person whom you know – or reasonably should know – to be incapacitated constitutes sexual misconduct.”
Thanks, Papa Yale. You really care!—you’re the best stepdad EVER! #Brazzers.
Check it out: