Akashinga vs third-wave feminism

Translation top: “These are the Akashinga, women soldiers who defend endangered animals from poachers.”

Translation bottom: “She is a third-wave feminist. We don’t really know what she does.”

The Akashinga

Meanwhile, Akashinga are governmental pawns who obediently protect “endangered animals” for those whose “worship the creation instead of the creator.”

“[They] changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.” Romans 1:25.

Moreover, Western media frequently idolize the Akashinga as “empowered domestic violence survivors,” and media parade at least one Akashinga member as saying that, since becoming become a Ranger, she can “finally afford to feed her family.”

But whom do the consumer puppets of these media prostitutes suppose are poaching the “endangered” animals? Millionaires and billionaires?

Follow the money

In the real world: the same kind of gluttonous elites who profiteer by selling pity-porn stories about the noble “Akashinga” — are the same kind of gluttonous elites who pay tiny financial crumbs to the desperate African middlemen who poach animals.

Modern society’s addiction to scapegoats

“If you’re not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.” — Malcolm X

This selective persecution of African “poachers” is like when Marion Barry was caught smoking crack with prostitutes while he was mayor of Washington, D.C.: as mayor, Barry was paid a lot of money to be in charge of all the arrests of the pimps, prostitutes, and drug-dealers in the city — while he was smoking crack with prostitutes.

Yet the orgasm of these social-masturbation stories about the Akashinga is how those desperate pawns have “arrested” X amount of
the other desperate pawns — as murderers continue their targeted mass-extermination of African human beings.

Third wave feminism vs anti-reality autocrats

The girl in the picture has teal hair — on her head and under her arms. What could be the point?

Well here is the factual situation:

(1) A woman in public without a shirt presents at least a political statement — and usually commits a criminal act. Yet women’s bodies will remain normal and natural long after the last Democrat and last Republican have strangled each other with the entrails of their limp legislations.

(2) Likewise, the most pitiful and weak, hyper-socialized eunuchs and eunuchettes have convinced themselves that morality dictates certain female mammals must hide reality: each must mask normalcy and present her armpits as those of a 7-year-old’s, throughout her life: shaving them in order to provide emotional comfort for anti-reality degenerates.

Thus, (3) as the weak and docile Akashinga are busy obediently “defending” fetishized beasts at the behest of banal, hypocritical elites — the feminist in the picture, and those like her, defend a far more valuable — and endagered — species: women willing to reject the anti-woman circus that currently masquerades as “morality.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s