Bill Nye the Actual-Science Guy: The true depth of Nye’s anti-science, anti-life climate-alarmism eugenics fraud

Plenty have seized on the fact that the Mechanical Engineering degree of Bill Nye the climate-alarmist guy provides Nye no training whatsoever to warrant Nye’s anti-science faith in the cult of climate-alarmism.

However, Bill Nye’s fraud is far deeper than Nye’s lack of formal training about climate and Nye’s anti-science ramblings about the moral imperative of preserving “mother earth” by exterminating “extra humans”: few disciplines on earth deal with real, practical, actual, cause-and-effect science more than Nye’s actual specialization: Mechanical Engineering.

“X does [X function]. See? Y does [Y function]. See? XY does [XY function]. See? Z does [Z function]. See?”

-The science of Mechanical Engineering

Thus, it is Nye’s extensive training in real science that most shames Nye’s insistence on politically prostituting himself for the anti-science, misanthropic cult of climate-alarmism — and the cult’s political parents: the various anti-life maniacs who are too cowardly to admit openly their goal of mass-extermination of humans.

Lindzen vs Nye: Scientist vs Eugenicist

Moreover, climate alarmism is not a myth: it is a strategy of misdirection, purposed to usher that mass-murder of billions of “extra humans,” as Bill Nye called them in his debate with Richard Lindzen on Larry King’s show in 2007 (watch below or Read The Transcript.

“Climate Denier” Dr. Richard Lindzen, Astrophysicist and professor of Meteorology at MIT vs Bill Nye the climate-alarmist guy, Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering

Compare the Curricula Vitae of Lindzen and Nye: Bill Nye’s CV | Richard Lindzen’s CV

Cult of climate-alarmism marches on…

Meanwhile, minions of the anti-science, anti-human cult of climate-alarmism are increasingly confident to make known how irrelevant they consider facts and reason to be, as evidenced in the following confrontation between “climate denier” Christopher Monckton and a group of anti-truth puppets of the climate-alarmism eugenics cult:

Christopher Monckton casts pearls of reality unto the swine pawns of anti-science, anti-life climate-alarmism

Paraphrased transcript

Monckton: [Something factual and reasonable].

Political prostitute#1: “We don’t really need to listen to your explanation, or the background of what you believe because if it is true, then you should be going out and saying that, and we should be seeing a scientific consensus leaning more towards what you are believing.”

Monckton: “It is a great mistake to believe that science is done by consensus. It is not.”

Political prostitute#1: “I KNOW IT’S NOT! BUT IF YOU CAN DISPROVE WHAT OTHER SCIENTISTS HAVE PROVE[N] — I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THAT. BUT UNTIL THEN, IF YOU STOP CALLING US NAZIS, AND ACTUALLY BASE IT ON PRINCIPLES — I WOULD APPRECIATE THAT.”

Political prostitute#2: “You called us Hitler-youth. That’s offensive. I have Jewish friends. Hitler killed thousands of Jews.”

Monckton: “And you are killing millions in the third-world [by your complicity in the implementation of policies which steal food from Africa to use as biofuels for anti-science social-veal].”

Conclusion

The true goal of climate-alarmism is the mass-murder of people, through starvation. The alarmists worship the creation, and the Creator allows this to the extent He sees fit.

Meanwhile, as to the science: Lindzen, in his 2010 testimony to Congress at a panel on global climate change (30:33), mentioned (quite in passing, as is his style) that the doomsday models of climate-alarmists simply fail to factor the inevitably increased evaporation at the earth’s surface, which (data show) will affect, with corresponding increase, the flux of radiative balance. Moreover, beginning at 56:40 of the panel video, witness a Science Professor from MIT describe a certain scientific function (specifically, Lindzen’s intends to describe the function’s irrelevance for considering the matter at hand). Then those whose addiction to anti-science political-pornography compels them to shame the consequences of science — they noticeably smirk and audibly giggle among each other, as if reality were a whoopie-cushion. To say the least: that smirking and giggling says nothing about the MIT professor or his mention of reality — and everything about the morally-lethargic political-prostitutes who thus giggled and smirked.

“Even if the U.S. shutdown, period — retired from the world: the impact on C02 levels would be rather undramatic”

Richard Lindzen, to the United States Congress, at a panel of Global Climate Change (1:113:48)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s