Silly self-identification as meager mis-identification

Well documented are the fickle, feeble facades of those hapless, harried hoards who “self-identify” (i.e. mis-identify) their gender for social pity and political reward—especially unloved, masochistic, suicidal men, whom ubiquitous misandry has relegated as modern eunuchs.

Less mentioned, yet ubiquitous, are those trans-ideological political-eunuchs who self-identify (i.e. mis-identify) their political persuasion:

Such self-identified (i.e. mis-identifying) “conservatives” as authored so-called Obamacare;[1]

the clarions of credulity who self-identify (i.e. mis-identify) as “progressive,” while advocating the most conservative canon possible: Extermination of the children of the poor, to make space and time for the children of the rich;[2]

and of course those jingoes, self-identified (i.e. mis-identified) as “lovers of liberty,” whose personal indulgences—mis-identified as “liberty”—by the terroristic maintenance which they require, inflict, upon the would, a significant net-loss of freedom.

In every case, the foundation of such self-identification (i.e. mis-identification) is a faith in moral-relativity, birthed and bent invariably by vanity and transitory delusion generally. In a word: It is not simply that it will not work; more purely: it cannot work.


[1] See Paul Abrams, The Affordable Care Act (“ACA” or “Obamacare”) was the conservative health care plan, fulfilling all major conservative principles (Huffington Post, 2017); see also Robert Reich, The irony of Republican disapproval of Obamacare (The Christian Science Monitor, 2013); but see Stuart M. Butler, Don’t blame Heritage for Obamacare mandate (The Heritage Foudation, 2012).

[2] “If you can’t feed them, don’t breed them,” has arisen as an articulation of a common enough article of faith among bourgeois advocates of child-murder: That any writhing peasant, to whom vile vassals of a centrally planned oligarchy have not deigned sufficient pittance, who dares to conceive a child—such children arrive on, and live or die by, the wheel of soical-roulette spun by the industrial preferences of one timocrat or another. Thence compulsion under the guise of a “right to choose:” The death of your child, else the death of at least your social-mobility, if not your immediate financial solvency. (Yet from the avalanche of ashes by this faustian bargain rise those familial phoenixes who would sooner slay the faustian frauds than their own children.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s